Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Blockchain-Driven Cybersecurity, Financial Transparency, and Risk Governance in Banking, Insurance, and SME-Centered Supply Chain Finance

Abstract

The accelerating digitalization of banking, insurance, and supply chain finance has fundamentally reshaped how economic value is created, transferred, and protected. While digital platforms have increased efficiency, speed, and inclusion, they have simultaneously amplified systemic vulnerabilities related to cybersecurity breaches, data opacity, fraud, and asymmetric risk distribution—particularly affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative infrastructural innovation capable of reconfiguring trust, transparency, and risk governance across financial and commercial ecosystems. This article develops a comprehensive, theoretically grounded, and integrative analysis of blockchain-enabled cybersecurity, financial transparency, and risk mitigation, synthesizing insights from cybersecurity research, decentralized governance theory, data integrity management, insurance transformation, and blockchain-empowered supply chain finance. Drawing strictly on the provided scholarly and institutional references, the study elaborates how blockchain’s core characteristics—immutability, decentralization, cryptographic security, consensus mechanisms, and programmable smart contracts—reshape risk identification, assessment, prevention, and allocation across banking, insurance, and SME financing contexts.

The article advances three central arguments. First, blockchain fundamentally alters the cybersecurity paradigm by shifting security assurance from perimeter-based defense models to distributed, trust-minimized architectures that enhance data integrity, auditability, and resilience against single points of failure. Second, blockchain-driven transparency mechanisms mitigate financial and operational risks by reducing information asymmetry, enhancing real-time visibility of transactions and assets, and enabling automated compliance through smart contracts. Third, when integrated into supply chain finance and insurance systems, blockchain enables a transition from reactive risk compensation toward proactive risk prevention and dynamic risk-sharing, particularly benefiting SMEs that traditionally face structural financing constraints.

Methodologically, the study employs an extensive qualitative synthesis of prior theoretical models, surveys, evolutionary and game-theoretic analyses, and policy reports referenced in the literature. Rather than empirical testing, it provides deep conceptual elaboration, comparative interpretation, and critical evaluation of competing perspectives. The results reveal that blockchain adoption can significantly lower fraud risk, financing costs, and default probabilities while improving trust among banks, insurers, core enterprises, and SMEs. However, the discussion also highlights governance challenges, scalability concerns, ethical implications of data transparency, and the persistent role of institutional trust even in ostensibly trustless systems. The article concludes by outlining future research directions and policy implications, emphasizing that blockchain’s value lies not in technological determinism but in its careful integration with regulatory frameworks, organizational incentives, and socio-economic contexts.

Keywords

Blockchain technology, cybersecurity, financial transparency, risk mitigation

pdf

References

  1. Bal, M., & Pawlicka, K. (2021). Supply chain finance and challenges of modern supply chains. Log Forum, 17, 71–82.
  2. Bansal, P., et al. (2020). Blockchain for cybersecurity: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies. IEEE.
  3. Bayraktar, M., & Algan, N. (2019). The importance of SMEs on world economies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 56–61.
  4. Bertino, E., et al. (2019). Data transparency with blockchain and AI ethics. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 11(4), 1–8.
  5. Chod, J., Trichakis, N., Tsoukalas, G., Aspegren, H., & Weber, M. (2020). On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Management Science, 66, 4378–4396.
  6. De Filippi, P. (2019). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: The pitfalls of a trustless dream. In Decentralized Thriving: Governance and Community on the Web 3.0.
  7. Deng, A., & Yu, B. (2017). Research overview of risk management of SMEs accounts receivable financing based on supply chain finance. World Journal of Research Review, 4, 16–20.
  8. Dong, L. N., & Zhang, M. (2023). A review of research on blockchain empowered supply chain financing in China. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 13.
  9. Ganin, A. A., et al. (2020). Multicriteria decision framework for cybersecurity risk assessment and management. Risk Analysis, 40(1), 183–199.
  10. Li, J., Zhu, S., Zhang, W., & Yu, L. (2020). Blockchain-driven supply chain finance solution for small and medium enterprises. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 7, 500–511.
  11. Lou, Y., Chang, Y., & Hao, F. (2022). The impact of blockchain technology on supply chain finance: A perspective based on tripartite game and dynamic evolutionary game. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 30, 352–360.
  12. ReportLinker. (2023). Supply chain finance global market report 2023.
  13. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 2117–2135.
  14. Salagrama, S., et al. (2022). Blockchain based data integrity security management. Procedia Computer Science, 215, 331–339.
  15. Sharma, V. (2025). Insurance transformation: From risk prevention to risk assumption, powered by blockchain. World Research of Business Administration Journal, 5(3), 150–161.
  16. Sun, R., He, D., & Su, H. (2021). Evolutionary game analysis of blockchain technology preventing supply chain financial risks. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 2824–2842.
  17. World Bank. (2019). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Finance.
  18. Zhou, L., Deng, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Game analysis of supply chain finance services for small and micro enterprises under the empowerment of blockchain. Financial Theory and Practice, 9, 21–31.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.