Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

IN VITRO ANTICOAGULANT EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF MUMIE ASSESSED BY THE LEE–WHITE METHOD

Abstract

 Mumie is a natural mineral–organic substance widely used in traditional medicine for various therapeutic purposes. However, its effects on blood coagulation may vary depending on geographical origin and chemical composition. To compare the in vitro effects of different types of mumie on whole-blood coagulation using the Lee–White method. Whole-blood coagulation time was assessed in vitro according to the Lee–White method. Samples of Afghan, Indian, Chinese, and Transbaikal mumie were tested at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 mg/mL. Control samples were analyzed without mumie. Coagulation time was recorded in minutes and compared across different mumie types and concentrations. Afghan, Indian, and Transbaikal mumie demonstrated pronounced anticoagulant activity, characterized by a dose-dependent prolongation of blood coagulation time. At concentrations of 2–5 mg/mL, coagulation time increased up to 30 minutes, while Afghan mumie at 10 mg/mL prolonged coagulation time to 90 minutes. In contrast, Chinese mumie exhibited minimal effects on coagulation, with only slight increases in clotting time across tested concentrations.

Keywords

Mumie, blood coagulation, anticoagulant activity, Lee–White method, traditional medicine, in vitro study.

PDF

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO), 2000. General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  2. Shahriari M, Zare F, Nimrouzi M. The Curative Role of Bitumen in Traditional
  3. Persian Medicine. Acta Med Hist Adriat. 2018;16(2):283-92
  4. Ghosal S. 2006. Shilajit in Perspective. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi India.
  5. Olivieri MF, Marzari F, Kesel AJ, Bonalume L, Saettini F. Pharmacology and psychiatry at the origins of Greek medicine: The myth of Melampus and the madness of the Proetides. J Hist Neurosci. 2017;26(2):193-215.
  6. Wilson E, Rajamanickam GV, Dubey GP,et al.2011. Review on shilajit used in traditional Indian medicine.J Ethnopharmacol 136:1–9
  7. Schepetkin I, Khebnikov A, Kwon BS. 2002. Medical drugs from humus matter: focus on mumie.Drug Devel Res57: 140–159
  8. Shirbeigi L ZA, Naghizadeh A, Alizadeh Vaghasloo M. The Concept of Temperaments in Traditional Persian Medicine. Trad Integr Med. 2017;2(3):143-56.
  9. Frolova N, Kiseleva L, Tatiana. Chemical composition of mumijo and methods for determining its authenticity and quality (a review). Pharma Chem J. 1996;30(8):543-7.
  10. Agarwal SP, Khanna R, Karmarkar R, Anwer MK, Khar RK. Shilajit: a review. Phytother Res. 2007;21(5):401-5.
  11. Verma A, Kumar N, Gupta L, Chaudhary S. Shilajitin Cancer Treatment: Probable Mode of Action. Int J Pharmaceutic Bio Arch. 2016;7(1):12-6.
  12. Stohs SJ, Singh K, Das A, Roy S, Sen CK. 12-Energy and Health Benefits of Shilajit. In: Bagchi D, editor. Sustained Energy for Enhanced Human Functions and Activity. Academic Press; 2017. p. 187-204
  13. Ghosal S, Lal J, Singh SK, Goel RK, Jaiswal AK, Bhattacharya SK. The need for formulation of Shilajit by its isolated active constituents. Phytother Res. 1991;5(5):211-6
  14. Trivedi N, Mazumdar B, Bhatt J, Hemavathi K. Effect of shilajit on blood glucose and lipid profile in alloxaninduced diabetic rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004;36(6):373-6.
  15. Загрутдинов, Ф. Ф., Мамадалиев, Ш. И., & Болтабоева, Д. Ф. (2024). Влияние Среднеазиатских Видов Мумиё на диурез и натрий урез у Крыс. Open Herald: Periodical of Methodical Research, 2(5), 12-14.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.