Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

HYGIENIC INDICATORS OF DRINKING WATER QUALITY AND HEALTH RISKS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS USING WELL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF FERGANA DISTRICT

Abstract

Access to safe drinking water remains a major public health challenge in rural areas where centralized water supply systems are absent. This study aimed to assess the hygienic quality of drinking water from wells used in rural settlements of Fergana District and to evaluate potential health risks associated with physicochemical and microbiological contamination. Water samples were collected from selected household and public wells and analyzed according to standard hygienic methods. Key indicators included organoleptic properties, physicochemical parameters (pH, total hardness, nitrates, nitrites, and heavy metals), and microbiological indicators (total coliforms and Escherichia coli). The results revealed that a significant proportion of samples exceeded recommended hygienic standards, particularly for nitrates and microbiological contamination. Identified health risks included gastrointestinal infections and chronic toxic effects, especially among vulnerable population groups such as children. The findings emphasize the need for systematic hygienic monitoring, improvement of well protection measures, and implementation of local water treatment solutions in rural areas.

Keywords

drinking water hygiene, well water, rural settlements, health risk assessment, Fergana District

PDF

References

  1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  2. World Health Organization. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Drinking-water. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
  3. Fewtrell L, Bartram J. Water Quality: Guidelines, Standards and Health. London: IWA Publishing; 2001.
  4. Howard G, Bartram J. Domestic water quantity, service level and health. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2003.
  5. Ward MH, Jones RR, Brender JD, et al. Drinking water nitrate and human health: An updated review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1557.
  6. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Sanitary rules and norms for drinking water quality. Tashkent; 2020.
  7. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Washington, DC: USEPA; 2011.
  8. Azizullah A, Khattak MNK, Richter P, Häder DP. Water pollution in Pakistan and its impact on public health. Environ Int. 2011;37(2):479–497.
  9. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. Drinking Water Safety and Quality Monitoring. Geneva; 2020.
  10. Kumar M, Ramanathan AL, Rao MS, Kumar B. Identification and evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in groundwater. Environ Earth Sci. 2006;50:1025–1035.
  11. Zhang X, Chen C, Lin P, et al. Health risk assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:24512–24525.
  12. Saidova, K., Madraimov, A., Kodirova, M., Madraimov, A., Kodirova, K., Babarakhimov, T., ... & Zokirov, K. (2024). Assessing the impact of invasive species on native aquatic ecosystems and developing management strategies. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Environmental Studies, 4, 45-51.
  13. Ashurova, M. D., Mo’ydinova, Y., Atadjanova, D., Muhammadova, G., & Ismoilov, D. (2023). Pedagogical efficiency of integrated learning in the organization of hygiene classes in medical universities. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 65, p. 10016). EDP Sciences.
  14. Rahmatshoyev, M. The importance of vitamins and minerals for athletes. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.