PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF POSTMODERN LITERARY PRACTICE

Authors

  • Aminova Nilufar Bukhara State Universitety Phd student

Keywords:

x

Abstract

Postmodernism has emerged as one of the most influential aesthetic and intellectual paradigms in contemporary literary studies, fundamentally reshaping traditional assumptions concerning truth, representation, authorship, and historical knowledge. This article investigates the philosophical foundations and structural mechanisms of postmodern literary practice through the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, and Jean-François Lyotard. Particular attention is paid to intertextuality and metafiction as core narrative strategies that translate postmodern epistemology into literary form. Drawing on the theoretical contributions of Bakhtin, Kristeva, Hutcheon, Waugh, Genette, and Currie, the study demonstrates that postmodern literature constructs a decentralized, polyphonic, and interpretively open textual space that resists fixed meaning and grand narratives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

Currie, M. (1995). Metafiction. Longman.

Derrida, J. (1967). Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Cornell University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Harper & Row.

Hutcheon, L. (1988). A poetics of postmodernism: History, theory, fiction. Routledge.

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language. Columbia University Press.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition. University of Minnesota Press.

Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond good and evil. Cambridge University Press.

Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Aminova Nilufar. (2025). PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF POSTMODERN LITERARY PRACTICE. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(12), 648–650. Retrieved from https://ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd/article/view/4366