ScaleSolve: An Intelligent LLM-Based Combinatorial Framework for Scalability Constraint Management
Keywords:
Large Language Models, Combinatorial Optimization, Scalability Constraints, Constraint ManagementAbstract
The increasing complexity of large-scale computational systems has created a need for intelligent approaches capable of managing heterogeneous constraints while preserving computational scalability. Conventional combinatorial methods provide rigorous optimization mechanisms, but their effectiveness may decline when problem structures become highly dynamic, multidimensional, or difficult to formulate explicitly. This paper proposes ScaleSolve, an intelligent Large Language Model (LLM)-based combinatorial framework for scalability constraint management. The framework conceptually integrates natural-language problem interpretation, constraint extraction, combinatorial problem formulation, candidate-generation mechanisms, adaptive search, feasibility verification, and scalability-aware solution selection. Its theoretical foundation is derived from established work on clustering, data mining, neural computational models, SDN controller placement, node scheduling, privacy-preserving computation, and imbalanced-data learning. The framework further builds on the emerging concept of combinatorial LLM frameworks for scalability constraints discussed by Ramamurthy, Bellamkonda, and Amanmadov (2026). The proposed methodology treats the LLM as an intelligent orchestration and reasoning layer rather than as an unrestricted optimization solver. This distinction enables deterministic validation and search procedures to complement language-based reasoning. The resulting architecture is designed to address constraint prioritization, search-space reduction, dynamic adaptation, and solution explainability. Analytical findings indicate that ScaleSolve offers a coherent architecture for connecting semantic problem understanding with combinatorial optimization while reducing dependence on manually specified solution strategies. The study identifies potential benefits for network management, data-intensive decision systems, clustering, scheduling, and other scalable optimization environments, while recognizing limitations related to model reliability, computational overhead, constraint-verification accuracy, and reproducibility.
Downloads
References
Al-Sultan, K. S. (1995). A Tabu search approach to the clustering problem. Pattern Recognition,28, 1443–1451.
Ashourian, M., Gheisari, M., & Talk honcheh, A. H. (2015). Animproved node scheduling scheme for resilient packet ring network. Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering,9,43–50.
Azim, M. A., Abdelhamid, A. A., Badr, N., & Tolba, M. (2019). Largevocabulary Arabic continuous speech recognition using tied states acoustic models . Asian Journal of InformationTechnology,18,49.
Bonner, R. (1964). On some clustering techniques.IBM Journal ofResearch and Development,8,22–32.
Castelo-Branco, F.,et al.(2020). Business intelligence and datamining to support sales in retail. In Marketing and smart technologies (pp. 406–419). Springer.
Chakrabarti, S., Ester, M., Fayyad, U., Gehrke, J., Han, J., Morishita, S., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Wang, W. (2014) Data Mining Curriculum: A Proposal (Version 1.0). ACM SIGKDD. 30April 2006. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
Dave, V. S., & Dutta, K. (2014). Neural network-based models for software effort estimation: A review. Artificial IntelligenceReview,42, 295–307.
Dunham, M. H. (2002).Data mining introductory and advanced topics, Pearson Education.
Fayyad, U., Djorgovski, S. G., & Weir, N. (1996).Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. MIT Press (pp. 471–494).
Gheisari, M., & Esnaashari, M. (2017). A survey to face recognitional gorithms: advantageous and disadvantageous. Journal of Modern Technology and Engineering,2,57–65.
Gheisari, M., Wang, G., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., & Zhang, W. (2017). Mapp:A modular arithmetic algorithm for privacy preserving in IoT. In2017 IEEE international symposium on parallel and distributed processing with applications and 2017 IEEE international conference on ubiquitous computing and communications (ISPA/IUCC) (pp. 897–903). IEEE.
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009). Learning from imbalanced data.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,21, 1263–1284.
Jalili, A. (2019). A new SDN-based framework for wireless localarea networks. International Journal of Nonlinear Anal ysisand Applications,10, 177–183.
Jalili, A., Keshtgari, M., & Akbari, R. (2018). A new set covering controller placement problem model for large scale SDNs.In formation Systems & Telecommunication,25.
Jalili, A., Keshtgari, M., Akbari, R., & Javidan, R. (2019). Multicriteria analysis of controller placement problem in software defined networks. Computer Communications,133, 115–128.
K. Ramamurthy, N. Bellamkonda and N. Amanmadov, "Scale Pulse: Combinatorial Llm Framework for Scalability Constraint," Southeast Con 2026, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon63549.2026.11476075
Geo Philip, Paulson, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Project Schedule Forecasting: A Predictive Framework for Time-Control in Complex Building Projects (April 16, 2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6588119 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6588119
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Minh Quang Nguyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
