Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
This is an outdated version published on 2026-04-25. Read the most recent version.

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2026)
International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development

Articles

LITERARY TEXT AND PRINCIPLES OF LINGUOPOETIC ANALYSIS

Published 2026-04-25

  • Ortiqova Nargizaxon

Ortiqova Nargizaxon
PhD., Senior Lecturer, Department of Uzbek Language and Literature, Ferghana State University, Ferghana City, 150100, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article explores the theoretical and practical principles of linguopoetic analysis of literary texts. Based on the views of Uzbek and world linguists, the author illuminates the specific characteristics of literary texts, their aesthetic nature, and the issues of poetic actualization of language units. The article classifies five main branches of linguopoetic analysis (phonopoetics, lexopoetics, morphopoetics, poetic semantics, and poetic syntax) and analyzes their role in determining artistic mastery.

Keywords

Literary text, linguopoetics, poetic actualization, phonopoetics, lexopoetics, morphopoetics, poetic semantics, poetic syntax, aesthetic function, principles of analysis, imagery, author's mastery.

PDF

References

  1. Yuldashev, M. (2008). Linguopoetics of the Literary Text. Tashkent: Fan.
  2. Izzat Sultan. (1980). Theory of Literature. Tashkent.
  3. Vinogradov, V.V. (1981). Problems of Russian Stylistics. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
  4. Yartseva, V.N. (Ed.). (1990). Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.
  5. Abdurahmonov, G. (1966). On the Study of the Language of Literary Works. In: Issues of Uzbek Language Teaching Methodology. Tashkent: Fan.
  6. Novikov, L.A. (1979). Linguistic Interpretation of the Literary Text. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk.
  7. Zhirmunsky, V.M. (1977). Theory of Literature. Poetics. Stylistics. Leningrad: Nauka.
  8. Khovanskaya, Z.I. (1980). Analysis of Literary Works in Modern French Philology. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
  9. Chicherin, A.V. (1964). Notes on the Stylistic Role of Grammatical Forms. In: Word and Image. Moscow.
  10. Timbolova, A.O. (2014). Linguopoetic Analysis of a Literary Text. Bulletin of KazNU. Philological Series, No. 1(147).
  11. Nurmonov, A. (2012). The Relation of Linguistics to Literature. Selected Works, Vol. 3. Tashkent.
  12. Tukhliyev, B. (2012). Some Reflections on the Analysis and Interpretation of Literary Works. In: Problems of Literary Text Analysis and Interpretation. Tashkent.
  13. Nurmonov, A. (2012). Selected Works, Vol. 1. Tashkent.
  14. Rikhsieva, G. (2003). Reflections on the Foundations of Linguopoetic Research. Uzbek Language and Literature, No. 2.
  15. Andaniyazova, D. (2016). Linguopoetic Study of Onomastic Units. Tashkent: Turon Zamin-Ziyo.
  16. Uralova, Ch.B., & Boymatov, S.Ch. (2021). Research of Linguopoetics in Modern Linguistics. Oriental Renaissance, Vol. 1, Issue 3.
  17. Yuldashev, M. (2000). Artistic Language Mastery of Cholpon. Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation. Tashkent.
  18. Muhammadjonova, G. (2004). Linguopoetic Study of Uzbek Poetry of the late 80s and early 90s. Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation. Tashkent.
  19. Shodieva, D.Sh. (2007). Linguopoetics of Muhammad Yusuf’s Poetry. Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation. Tashkent.
  20. Yuldashev, B., & Shodieva, Z. (2006). Issues of Linguopoetic Analysis of the "Horizon" (Ufq) Trilogy. Samarkand: SamDU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.