Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 03 (2026)
Volume 13 Issue 03

Articles

LINGVOGENDER FEATURES OF COMPLEX SENTENCES WITH A PARENTHESIZED INSERTIONAL COMPONENT AS A LINGVOGENDER ELEMENT IN ENGLISH, UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES

Published 2026-03-19

  • M.G. Khoshimov

M.G. Khoshimov
Ph.D. Associate Professor of ASIFL

Abstract

The article addresses one of the lesser-explored issues in the theory of complex sentences with a parenthetical inserted clause (CSPIC), specifically their linguo-genderological features in modern English, Uzbek, and Russian. In particular, it identifies and explores the genderological properties of CSPIC as linguo-genderemes in the speech of representatives of the masculine and feminine genders. As a result, a new taxonomy of the complex sentences under investigation is developed, revealing their isomorphic and allomorphic characteristics, as well as the factors that influence these differences.

Keywords

linguogenderology, linguogenderemе, composite sentences with a parenthetical inserted clause, taxonomy.

PDF

References

  1. Горошко Е. И. Языковое сознание: гендерная парадигма. — М., 2003.
  2. Гриценко Е. С. Язык. Дискурс. Гендер. — Н.Новг., 2005.
  3. Земская Е.А., Китайгородская М.А., Розанова Н.Н. Особенности мужской и женской речи // Русский язык в его функционировании. Под Ред. Е. А. Земской и Д. Н. Шмелева. — М., 1993. — С. 90—136.
  4. Кирилина А. В. Гендер: лингвистические аспекты. — М., 1999.
  5. Крейдлин Г. Е.Мужчины и женщины в невербальной коммуникации, М., 2005
  6. Тухтасинов И.М. Лингвокультурологические и гендерные особенности сложных слов в художественном тексте (на материале английского и узбекского языков). Автореф. дисс. ... канд. филол. наук,Ташкент, 2011.
  7. Эргашева Г.И. Турли тизимдаги тилларда гендерга оид терминологиянинг шаклланишида лингвистик ва экстралингвистик омиллар. Филол. Фан. докт.дисс...(DSc) автореферати, Тошкент, 2018.
  8. Coats J. Women, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. — New York, 1986. — 389 p.
  9. Lakoff R.T. Language and women’s Place // Language in Society. — 1973. — N 2. — P. 45-79.
  10. Malts D.N. & Broker R.A. (1982). A cultural approach to male and female miscommunication. In J.J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (p. 196—216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Spender M. Man made language. Routledge and Kegan Paul. London, 1985. D. Tannen. You just don't understand. New York: Ballantine, 1990.
  12. Tannen D. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. — New York, 1990.
  13. The Handbook of Language and Gender. Ed. by J.Holmes and M. Meyerhoff. Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
  14. West C., Zimmerman D.H. (1985). Gender. language and discourse/handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 4. P. 103—124.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.