DIFFICULTIES AND EQUIVALENCE IN SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL TRANSLATION
Keywords:
Scientific translation, technical translation, English-Uzbek translation, linguistic equivalence, borrowing, calquing, literal translation, modulation, adaptation, terminology, structural features.Abstract
Scientific and technical translation requires a high degree of linguistic precision and subject matter knowledge. This article explores the core structural and methodological aspects of English-Uzbek scientific translation, focusing on the equivalence and adequacy of translation. It examines essential translation methods such as borrowing, calquing, literal translation, transposition, modulation, equivalency, and adaptation. Each method is analyzed in the context of bridging linguistic and cultural gaps while preserving technical accuracy and stylistic clarity. The article also highlights the challenges translators face, including semantic gaps, structural mismatches, and the need for terminological consistency. Emphasis is placed on the importance of translator competence in both languages, domain knowledge, and a deep understanding of technical registers.
Downloads
References
Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. Prentice Hall.
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. John Benjamins.
Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. Routledge.
Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. Oxford University Press.
Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. Longman.
Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In Loanwords in the World’s Languages (pp. 35–54).
Shamsutdinova, M. (2010). Terminologik tarjima va uning o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari. O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


