DEVELOPING STUDENTS' SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH THE CLIL APPROACH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

Authors

Ganieva Shakhnoza Abutalibovna,Nosirov Abdurahim Abdimutalipovich Uzbekistan State World Languages University Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

CLIL, foreign language teaching, speaking skill, communication strategies, content-based instruction, language proficiency

Abstract

Speaking a foreign language fluently is essential in today's educational environment. However, when language abilities are inadequate, many students face communication difficulties. This study investigates how non-linguistic university students can improve their speaking skills by using the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach. By combining language learning with content-based instruction (CBI), CLIL enhances students' capacity to communicate in spite of language barriers while also advancing topic knowledge. The study emphasises useful strategies, significant obstacles, and how CLIL affects speaking abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002

Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not. System, 41(3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508

Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2012). L1 use and morphosyntactic development in the oral production of EFL learners in a CLIL context. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2012-0006

Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual education & Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union.

Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality-CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Papers from the 5th International CLIL Conference. University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt.

Merisuo-Storm, T. (2007). Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign language learning and the development of literacy skills in CLIL classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002

Nikula, T. (2007). Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes, 26(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00445.x

Pérez-Vidal, C. (2009). The integration of content and language in the classroom: A European approach to education (The CLIL approach). In E. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (Eds.), CLIL across educational levels: Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts (pp. 11–17). Richmond Publishing.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30(2), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-177

Downloads

DOWNLOAD PDF

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Ganieva Shakhnoza Abutalibovna,Nosirov Abdurahim Abdimutalipovich. (2025). DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH THE CLIL APPROACH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 12(05). Retrieved from https://ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd/article/view/3028